<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The December Dilemma &#8211; Inclusive Holiday Practices for Public Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizensproject.org/2009/12/05/the-december-dilemma-inclusive-holiday-practices-for-public-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizensproject.org/2009/12/05/the-december-dilemma-inclusive-holiday-practices-for-public-schools/</link>
	<description>Creating a community valuing diversity, equality and religious freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jocko</title>
		<link>http://www.citizensproject.org/2009/12/05/the-december-dilemma-inclusive-holiday-practices-for-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>jocko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizensproject.org/?p=1233#comment-192</guid>
		<description>But, for the first 150 years of our Republic, the Supreme Court ruled over and over again that the Bible was suitable and even recommended as a teaching vehicle in public schools. One has to believe that these earlier Supreme Courts were much more in touch with the intentions of the Constitutional framers than today&#039;s activist judges. Our country was started as a Christian country and the intent as stated in concurrent historical documents was to provide Christians freedom of worship. Not provide freedom from worship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, for the first 150 years of our Republic, the Supreme Court ruled over and over again that the Bible was suitable and even recommended as a teaching vehicle in public schools. One has to believe that these earlier Supreme Courts were much more in touch with the intentions of the Constitutional framers than today&#8217;s activist judges. Our country was started as a Christian country and the intent as stated in concurrent historical documents was to provide Christians freedom of worship. Not provide freedom from worship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
