Community Discussions to Improve Local Election Processes
The League of Women Voters will host one additional community discussion on March 29th from 9:30-11:30am at First United Methodist Church, 420 N. Nevada.
Meetings are a good idea, but some cannot attend. I have a comment. During the recall election last year, there were many who did not know the boundaries of where eligible voters lived. Local papers did not help. Clarifying the boundaries of each district should be a priority. Redistricting should also be apolitical. At least they should try to be open to comment before deciding them.
[…] code and a more robust, public process for city council redistricting. We’ve recently conducted a series of seven community meetings to gather public input on potential reforms to our city’s election code and are preparing to […]
Luanne Buzbee
February 25, 2014 (3:29 pm)
Meetings are a good idea, but some cannot attend. I have a comment. During the recall election last year, there were many who did not know the boundaries of where eligible voters lived. Local papers did not help. Clarifying the boundaries of each district should be a priority. Redistricting should also be apolitical. At least they should try to be open to comment before deciding them.
Citizens Project Mid-Year Update | Citizens Project
July 15, 2014 (3:13 pm)
[…] code and a more robust, public process for city council redistricting. We’ve recently conducted a series of seven community meetings to gather public input on potential reforms to our city’s election code and are preparing to […]