|






|
June 1997
This Month's Articles (click a title to jump to that article):
The intimate enemy
Ethical issue of the decade
The spirit of community
D-11 votes on sexual conduct policy
Newsbriefs
By Donna Minkowitz
Donna Minkowitz covered gay and lesbian politics and
culture for the Village Voice for eight years. Her writing
has also appeared in The Nation, Ms., the Utne Reader,
New York magazine and the Advocate. Minkowitz,
who has won journalism awards from Radcliffe College, the National
Women's Political Caucus and GLAAD, lives in Brooklyn, New York.
She is currently working on a book about the gay movement and the
religious right.
The following is a short excerpt from a talk Minkowitz gave in
March as the annual speaker of the Colorado Springs Justice and
Peace Commission.
° ° °
When I first started writing about the religious right six years
ago, I thought I knew very clearly who they were: every thing I
was not. I was a gay activist and they were frightened of sexuality.
I was a feminist, and they hated women. I was against authoritarianism,
and they thought children should be belted and Third World governments
should be kept in line. I was against retribution, and they believed
in a God who was going to torture unbelievers in hell for all eternity
simply because they didn't believe in him.
Every issue I was for, they were against. They didn't think the
poor deserved welfare, but they did think the contras and the apartheid
government in South Africa did. They saw innocent recreational sex
as dangerous, but often tried to squash government efforts to prevent
the most baneful form of sexuality, sexual abuse within the family.
In so many ways, it was hard not to think of them as agents of the
Devil. The religious right not only believed in everything that
was wrong, they were so well-organized, so well-funded,
so successful, that they appeared to be the insidious minions of
some sort of satanic superman. I think I saw them as nearly omnipotent.
I don't literally believe in the Devil, but I think I really did
see the religious right that way - as the representatives of evil,
evil's special people. In the same way that evangelical conservatives
speak of Satan, I thought about the religious right: that any time
they were resisted, thwarted, offended, hurt or shamed was a victory
for the forces of good and a defeat for the Enemy who wants to hurt
us all.
One of the reasons that I felt this way was that I am a member
of a constituency that has been attacked and harmed pretty badly
by the religious right: lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. I first
started writing about them the year they began to sponsor ballot
initiatives aimed at depriving gaypeople of protections from discrimination
in housing and employment. Organizers across the country suggested
that homosexuals were economic predators, secret Nazis, dangerous
disease spreaders who wanted straights to die, serial murderers,
and sexual abusers of children. Being the object of hate literature
was extremely frightening. I am sure that most of you will understand
if I say that I felt personally and directly threatened by the religious
right at that time. I still do - not just on gay issues, but on
a whole host of other ones as well. But as I spent more time studying
the religious right, my attitudes toward them changed in a way I
never could have anticipated. Specifically, what's changed is the
part of me that saw them as everything I am not.
I started going in disguise to religious right conferences and
rallies because I wanted to experience my nemesis. I think it was
almost an act of bravado, a desire to come up close to the people
who hate me and survive time spent with them. It felt like going
to the underworld. At the first Christian Coalition conference I
went to, the Navy women who'd been sexually harassed at Tailhook
were denounced as "sluts," and we all wildly applauded
Beverly LaHaye when she said that '"we real women
want husbands - husbands of the male gender! I feel sorry for the
radical women's movement, because they cannot experience that kind
of love!"
Later, in a grocery in a small town in Mississippi, a young man
threatened me with rape just because I'd asked him journalistic
questions about the lesbian feminist educational retreat down the
road. Meeting people like this and coming back alive and whole from
the experience gave me a considerable sense of power. I could document
and expose these people, and no one but me controlled how I represented
them. That's probably what made it possible for me to take the next
step in my work with the religious right - not just exposing their
loathsomeness, but exposing myself to my readers as well. Dressed
up as a Christian right activist, I found myself becoming aware
of parts of myself [I'd never known] were there. Somehow, there
were all these religious right personas inside me.
The parts of myself that I met when I put on thes clothes and mingled
at religious right gatherings were very unsettling. When I went
to my first Christian Coalition conference in '93, I confronted
a person inside me who wanted to be dumb, airheaded, and feminine
and submit to authority. Enthusiastically waving the American flag
that was part of my place setting, I realized how easy it was for
me to enjoy fascistic spectacle. I was at the "God and Country
Banquet" and anthems of each of this country's military services
were being sung as we saluted Ollie North, the evening's honoree.
It was delicious, waving my flag and honoring a man who had fundraised
for torturers. It was also suspiciously easy to get into character
as the mindless waif I was posing as, the one that knew that man
was her head, just as Christ was the head of the church. Did I want
to be her? It felt deliciously forbidden.
I saw something rather different about myself when I spent a week
with the Rev. Fred Phelps in Topeka, Kansas. Phelps and his congregation
are known for flying around the country picketing the funer- als
of people who die of AIDS, with colorful signs saying things like
FAGS ARE WORTHY OF DEATH and DISEASED FAG SCUM. He also mails AIDS-bereaved
parents letters that call their departed children "filthy piece(s)
of human garbage" and the like. Unlike most of the people I
cover, they were very upfront about their desire to hurt people.
Visiting them was my real underworld journey, a journey to my own
personal frightening place, not just theirs. For they were very
familiar. A lot of my own political activism and my writing and
even just my daily activities in the world had been motivated by
the same desire, which I had always interpreted as the desire to
fight back. To me, Phelps didn't feel like an alien, but a brother
- hurting his enemies any way he could. "I love to use words
that send them off the edge emotionally," he'd told me. "there's
nothing better than that." For a long time, I had also loved
to offend people. It felt like I was grinding the oppressor's head
into the dirt. Spending time with the Phelpses, I saw that in their
own minds, that was exactly what they were doing, too.
The third journey that I'd like to tell you about occurred about
two years ago. For an article for Ms. I disguised myself
as a teenage boy to attend a two-day gathering of the Promise Keepers,
the evangelical men's movement that's attracted hundreds of thousands
of men. At this sweaty assembly in the St Petersburg Thunderdome,
wearing a convincing false mustache and.a Mike Tyson T-shirt, I
had a sort of holy experience.
The Promise Keepers, in all their contradictory splendor, turned
out to be something I had never expected to find, a right-wing Christian
group that was sort of feminist - and was doing some good. They
weren't all good. They do oppose abortion rights and gay
rights, they're quite suspicious of sex generally, and about a fifth
of their messages are poisonous platitudes about women needing to
submit to their husbands and men needing to take authority back.
But the other four fifths of the messages totally contradict this
one. Most of the speeches from the podium were how men need to stop
being men as this culture defines them-violent, selfish, emotionless,
uncaring, and dominating. By and large, what men were being told
to do was stop abusing and stranding their friends, wives and children
and learn how to nurture themselves and the people in their lives.
It was a startlingly feminist message. And in some ways, it was
a message that really spoke to me, because there's a part of me
that's a lot like a man. Many lesbians - and lots of straight women,
for that matter - have grown up terrified of not being tough enough,
fearful of weakness and effeminacy. I knew how much it had hurt
me to feel this fear that is part of every masculine being, and
I was beginning to understand how much it hurt men. In the Thunderdome,
clutching weeping men who thought I was a boy, I finally knew for
sure that men were hurt by gender just as much as women were. What
I had in common with the religious right, it turned out, was not
only a whole host of ugly but innocent feelings - like the urge
to throw my enemies in a lake of fire, or the passionate longing
to submit to and omnipotent and capricious Being, or the desire
to run the entire country according to my beliefs - but also compassion,
love, and the desire to protect and heal myself and other people.
They were not evil's special people, it turned out, but my people.
My relatives, not the Demon.
And if they weren't the Demon, it was finally much less easy to
see myself that way. As Richard Hofstadter suggested, when we demonize,
it's ourselves we are demonizing mainly. The hated enemy, Hofstadter
writes, gives us "an opportunity to project and freely express
unacceptable aspects of our own minds." Sometimes, it turns
out, the only way to embrace the self is to embrace "evil's
special people." CP
© Donna Minkowitz 1997
back to top
by James W. White, Senior Minister, First Congregational Church
of Christ, Colorado Springs
On November 19. 1983 the Bill Moyers' documentary
on Colorado Springs, called "The New Holy Wars," was first
shown on public television. Our church had a watch- the-progam-
evening before a big screen TV set. That same weekend Conference
Ministers (read: Bishops) of our denomination, The United Church
of Christ, were meeting at Camp LaForet in the Black Forest. They
were interested in seeing the program but could not get reception
out there ... so they joined with members of our congregation for
viewing. In the after-program discussion, I said, "I think
that with media acceptance of gays and with medical studies done,
the homosexual controversy will go away quickly." David Jamieson
of the Northern California conference replied, saying, "I wish
you were right, Jim, but I think homosexuality is the defining ethical
issue for the 1990s."
David Jamieson was prophetic. I was naive. For the last four years
our church has been caught up in the issue of inclusion-exclusion
of gay and lesbian persons, generally, and of the in-the-sanctu-
ary same-gender commitment ceremonies, specifically. On March 9,
1997, by a vote of 173-91, the congregation passed a Statement of
Participation" which welcomes persons of all ages, sexes, races,
handicaps, and sexual orientation into full communion, including
the rite of "holy unions" for same-gender couples. You
will believe me when I say this has not been easy.We have lost members
and dollars, and the whole process has beenl clouded by secondary
and tertiary issues. Is the Participation Statement doctrine? (No.)
Is the pastor certifiable? (Probably.) Etc. Basically, though, the
issue itself is behind us.
For most churches it is still in front of them. I don't know if
our experience can be instructive, but I do know we learned a lot
about being faithful. What we came to realize is that just as race
was the defining ethical issue for the '60s, as war was the defining
issue for the '70s, women's rights in the'80s ... gay and lesbian
concerns have moved front and center as the ethical issue of this
decade. It will not go away. All Christians are having te face what
the Bible says about homosexuality - and, does it say anything?
Some folk on The Way are dealing with questions of allowing access
to the communion table and Christian baptism for children of same-gender
couples. In many churches the issue has focused on the question
of the ordination of gay and lesbian persons.
We found the book by Sally Gels and Donald Messer called Caught
in the Crossfire: Helping Christians Debate Homosexuality to
be helpful. One of the things Gels and Messer note is that the issue
of homosexuality is like a fish bone caught in the throat: it can
neither be swallowed nor can it be coughed up. It is just there/here
to be dealt with. We ended up calling the group that directed our
studies at the church "The Fishbone Committee"!
People have asked me if all the agony has been worth it. I have
to say "No" if I consider the hurt that many good people
have felt, but I have to say "Yes" when I consider the
ethical issue(s) and the greater hurt to persons which exclusion
promulgates. Overall our church is healthier than it has ever been.
We've had over 200 people join our church since the controversies
began; worship attendance has been such that we've gone to two services;
the Sunday School is thriving; community life is excellent; deep
spiritual growth is taking place (especially through labyrinth walking);
our operating budget has grown by over $100,000; and we've completed
a million-dollar renovation on the building. We're going to be all
right - and, I think it is because we did and are doing the right
ethical thing. Other churches may find this to be so for themselves,
too. Christ's presence, his just/loving presence, be with you, my
friends. CP
back to top
"The spark we have been waiting for!" is
certainly one way to describe the Gill Foundation. The work of literally
hundreds of community-based organizations throughout Colorado and
the United States has been sparked by the Gill Foundation, a Colorado
Springs-based philanthropic organization dedicated to issues of
social justice. In Colorado Springs, this spark has jump-started
many in the progressive community to build coalitions, become active
again or for the first time, and to challenge old notions about
citizen organizing in this community.
The Gill Foundation was established in 1994 by Tim Gill, the founder
and chair of Quark; Inc., a Denver-based computer software company.
The mission of the foundation is to support the needs of under-served
and under-funded communities in their struggle for equality. The
foundation focuses its funding on activities and organizations serving
gay men and lesbians, people living with AIDS, and other minorities.
Since its inception, the Gill Foundation has provided nearly $5
million in grants to organizations across the country and in Colorado.
In doing so, the Gill Foundation has become an important force in
the Colorado civil rights movement. Rooted in the philosophy that
the most important thing a foundation can do is help people help
themselves, Tim Gill, and his Colorado and Washington, DC-based
professional staff of seven, work diligently to build alliances
with the communities they serve. By developing close relationships
with their core constituencies, they are able to respond effectively
to the needs of the gay and lesbian community and others to develop
funding strategies and special programs which strengthen various
communities. "We are particularly interested in funding programs
in non-urban areas of the country," said Katherine Pease, Executive
Director of the Gill Foundation. "These non-urban-area organizations
do not readily have access to traditional sources of funding and
it is important in our grantmaking practices to take a leadership
role in socially responsible philanthropy."
The Gill Foundation helps fund several projects in Colorado Springs,
such as Ground Zero, Citizens Project, and the Colorado Springs
Community Alliance. The Colorado Springs community recently has
begun to benefit from another program of the Gill Foundation: the
Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund. The Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund
was established in 1996 to build awareness of the contributions
gay men and lesbians make as part of American society. The Fund
was inspired in part by The Cheshire Ball, a fundraising event sponsored
by Colorado's gay and lesbian community to raise money for organizations
dedicated to serving Colorado's children. The Ball has awarded over
$159,000 to children's organizations since 1994 and anticipates
raising over $70,000 for Colorado children's organizations at the
1997 Ball.
The most recent high profile event of the Gay and Lesbian OutGiving
Fund was an historic occasion for Colorado Springs. On May 7th,
Elie Wiesel, Nobel Laureate, Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient
and Holocaust survivor, was welcomed to the community for a speech
at Palmer High School. For weeks prior to this Holocaust Commemoration,
numerous diverse groups, under the leadership of Food for Thought
Gatherings, worked together to plan the event, Groups involved included
Temple Shalom, New Life Church, Chinook Bookshop, Ground Zero, Citizens
Project and the Gill Foundations Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund,
which provided a large financial contribution that made Wiesel's
appearance possible.
The collaboration needed to make such an important event happen
is precisely the purpose of the Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund.
Said Pease, "Every day, gay men and lesbians support causes
and organizations that affect everyone's quality of life. Because
there has been no way of identifying this money as coming from the
gay and lesbian community this philanthropy has been, in a sense,'invisible'.
The Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund is dedicated to bringing to light
this previously invisible philanthropy of gay men and lesbians."
Other recent grants of the Gay and Lesbian OutGiving Fund include:
Kempe Children's Foundation "Drive Against
Child Abuse Capital Campaign"- $25,000; KRCC Public
Radio $17,500; Christmas in April which
uses volunteers to repair homes of low income families - $2,000;
Colorado's Ocean Journey, an interactive aquarium
planned for the Denver area - $1 Million.
Added Pease, "We are always looking for collaborative opportunities
in the Colorado Springs community. We invite your phone calls and
inquiries about how we can work in partnership with diverse groups
and coalitions." CP
The Gill Foundation, including the Gay and Lesbian
OutGiving Fund, can be reached at: 8 S. Nevada, Suite 103, Colorado
Springs, CO 88901, 719-473-4455, or by E-mail at GillFound@aol.com
back to top
In the final chapter of the controversy stirred by
the Palmer Lever articles on gay teens, the District 11
School Board has drafted a Health Education Policy and submitted
it for review. After addressing the content of the Lever
article by revising the student publications policy, the board faced
a campaign, launched by Colorado for Family Values, to adopt a Sexual
Conduct Policy. CFV pushed for a policy that would, among other
things, require the district to affirm traditional marriage. The
Board's Health Education Policy draft fell short of CFV's expectations
however, as it fails to mandate the promotion of "traditional
marriage", the most controversial component of Will Perkins'
proposed policy.
The district's four page draft policy emphasizes responsibility,
a healthy lifestyle and avoiding high risk behavior. The policy
recognizes the role and responsibility of parents as the primary
influence on their Children and codifies their right to excuse their
children from curriculum that contradicts their beliefs or teachings.
Board Policy Subcommittee members Lyman Kaiser and Bruce Doyle developed
the draft, keeping in mind the majority of students in the district
do not come from "traditional families" as CFV defines
them. Basically, their new policy strengthens and clarifies current
policy and practice. The proposed policy was discussed at the May
21 School Board meeting. The Board expects to vote on the policy
on Wednesday, June 4. That meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m.
We would be glad to provide you with a copy of the proposed
policy. Just give us a call: 719-520-9899.
back to top
Arvada Springs?
Westword recently reported on the takeover of Arvada's
Republican party by the far right. Now derisively labeled "Arvada
Springs" (after our own fair city) by old-line Republicans,
the city has seen a dramatic swing to the right in Republican leadership.
As Arvada Republican Al Meiklejohn explains, "These people
have a view that churches ought to run the government. [They] want
to impose their views on us by governmental force."
All three of Arvada's representatives (Barry Arrington, Mark Paschall
and Jim Congrove) are from the far-right camp of the Republican
Party. Arrington helped found Rocky Mountain Family Council, a state
organization affiliated with Focus on the Family. During the election,
some moderate Republicans even launched a campaign supporting the
Democratic candidates running against these three Republicans.
Militia sympathizer, Pat Miller, is a driving force behind Arvada's
recent takeover. She began her political involvement by challenging
a book in her son's school and went on to unsuccessfully challenge
Congressman David Skaggs' seat twice. True to Pat Robertson's style,
Miller is now using the mailing list from her failed campaigns to
bolster her new employer, Citizens for Responsible Government, an
anti-abortion lobby known for blasting moderate Republicans. Says
Miller, "I know how to run campaigns and I know how to network;
I know grassroots work, I know how to raise money now, and I'm going
to look for good candidates just like me."
CFV's Run-in with the Law
Colorado for Family Values is currently embroiled in a legal battle
over their failure to disclose public information. The Colorado
Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that CFV violated the Campaign
Reform Act by failing to register as a political campaign and disclose
campaign donors. CFV launched a campaign to raise $1 million for
an "Amendment 2 Legal Defense Fund" in May of 1993. The
Fund was formed to oppose a Protection from Discrimination initiative
which would have overturned Amendment 2. (The initiative failed
to gather enough signatures by the filing deadline and the effort
was abandoned). CFV may appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court. However,
if the court does not grant review, they will be forced to fulfill
registration requirements and disclose the donors to their campaign.
Cleveland Voucher Plan Overturned
An Ohio appeals court struck down Cleveland's voucher program on
May 1, ruling that it allowed governmental aid to religion. The
Cleveland program, now nearing the end of its first year, was the
first large-scale voucher program to provide public funds for private
religious school tuition. The court was troubled by the fact that
80 percent of the schools which agreed to accept vouchers were parochial
schools. It held that the voucher program limited parental choice
to struggling city schools or sectarian schools.
Ralph Reed, Campaign Guru
Ralph Reed recently resigned as Executive Director of the Christian
Coalition. He has announced his plans to start a new organization,
Century Strategies, to manage campaigns "at every level of
government" Century Strategies will focus on "building
a 'farm team' of hundreds of state legislative, school board and
local candidates across the country," Reed recently explained.
Look for stealth tactics, coming soon to an election near you.
End of Session Brings End for Hate Crimes Bill
Although it progressed further than any previous similar legislation,
a bill aimed at extending the existing Ethnic Intimidation Act was
defeated before the end of the Colorado legislative session. The
Hate Crimes bill would have punished as a hate crime any assault
against a person because of age, sexual orientation, or physical
or mental disability. The bill would have amended the Ethnic Intimidation
Act, which addresses crimes motivated by race, color or ethnic origin.
CP
Inside CP
You and your scissors can improve Citizens Project's monitoring
efforts. Citizens Project maintains an extensive research library
with over 500 files on issues and organizations. If you come across
examples or coverage of extremism in publications or on the internet,
send it our way. Information in our library is used by the media
and students and for Freedom Watch research. Our motto:
when in doubt, cut it out! Our volunteer librarians will decide
what we can use. (Don't worry about local papers and the state-wide
dailies, we have them covered.) See below for mailing and fax information.
CP in the News
Citizens Project broke the story on the American Family Association's
efforts to ban Howard Stern's book from the Pikes Peak Library District.
While it was painful to drum up publicity for the AFA and (to a
greater extent) Howard Stern, attacks on our libraries should be
public knowledge. CP was quoted about this issue in the Independent
and provided information to the Gazette and the Denver
Post. Megan Day was a guest on P.M. Wynn's new talk show on
1460AM and appeared on local TV stations addressing the District
11 School Board. CP Board member Richard Van Scotter's opinion piece
in the Gazette elicited many letters to the editor. The
Cheyenne Edition used us as a resource for a story on core
knowledge curriculum. CP
back to top
|